There were concerns raised before and during the Public Inquiry that there was insufficient promotion of the Inquiry. We know the Council may come back and say that they fulfilled their legal obligation of a notice in a local newspaper and the posting of a notice at the Council offices the day before. However, we believe this equates to the bare minimum. Which for a gateway site to Margate seafront, is in stark contrast to the resources allocated to the Dreamland CPO Inquiry in the summer.
A week before the Inquiry an ad was placed in a paper, but not the more widely read and available Thanet Gazette. Instead the free paper the Thanet Extra, which is distributed to just under 33,000 homes. Personally, we’ve never received one at our address. The Thanet Gazette published on Friday November 2nd, the final edition before the Inquiry, didn’t include a mention of the Inquiry.
On Monday morning on November 5th, we contacted the Planning Department with urgency. It was confirmed to us the Inquiry wasn’t on the Council website and it was sufficient it had been placed in the paper.
The Inquiry started on Tuesday November 6th and 10am. At 9.23am a tweet from the Council’s Twitter feed was published announcing that the Inquiry would start on November 6th.
The tweet linked to a page on the Council website which stated a publication date of Friday November 2nd. However, some close inspection of the source code from the Council website reveals the content was created on November 2nd 2012 and published on November 6th 2012.:
<meta name=”DC.Date.Issued” content=”2012-11-06″ scheme=”W3CDTF” />
<meta name=”DC.Date.Created” content=”2012-11-02″ scheme=”W3CDTF” />
<meta name=”DC.Contributor” content=”Paul Lawes” />
<meta name=”DC.Coverage.Temporal” content=”2012-11-02″ scheme=”W3CDTF” /><meta name=”DC.Identifier” content=”http://www.thanet.gov.uk/news/latest_press_releases/arlington_inquiry.aspx” scheme=”URI” />
<meta name=”DC.title” content=”Arlington Inquiry” /><meta name=”DC.creator” content=”Thanet District Council” />
<meta name=”DC.publisher” content=”Thanet District Council” />
<meta name=”DC.date” content=”2012-11-06″ scheme=”W3CDTF” />
<meta name=”DC.language” content=”eng” scheme=”ISO 639-2/T” />
<meta name=”DC.format” content=”text/html” />
<meta name=”eGMS.Status” content=”Version 4 For Publication” />
Why does this matter?
Well, clearly it did. Because throughout the Inquiry proceedings many residents spoke up and complained they did not know the Inquiry was being held or have sufficient details.
Contrary to the Dreamland CPO there was also no daily reporting from the TDC communications department and the one page, one paragraph statement is all there is to date.